Opinion
2:21-cv-01364-CDS-DJA
10-05-2022
Kane, Temple & Myers PLLC d/b/a The702Firm, Plaintiff, v. Harris Law Firm, LLP, Defendant. Harris Law Firm, LLP, Counterclaimant, v. Kane, Temple & Myers PLLC d/b/a The702Firm, Counter-Defendant.
MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, PLC Christine Lebrón-Dykeman Michael J. McCue Meng Zhong LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Kane, Temple & Myers PLLC d/b/a The702Firm Mark G Tratos Bethany L. Rabe Greenberg Traurig LLP Attorneys for Defendant
MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, PLC Christine Lebrón-Dykeman Michael J. McCue Meng Zhong LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Kane, Temple & Myers PLLC d/b/a The702Firm
Mark G Tratos Bethany L. Rabe Greenberg Traurig LLP Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [ECF NO. 22]
CRISTINA D. SILVA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Kane, Temple & Myers PLLC, owner of The702Firm trademark (“Kane”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) hereby stipulates to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted in Kane's First Amended Complaint against Richard A. Harris, a Professional Corporation and Harris Law Firm, LLP (“Harris”) including in relation to Harris's future use of 702 LAWYERS as a phone number, website, in advertising, or otherwise. Harris, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), hereby stipulates to the dismissal with prejudice of all affirmative defenses and counterclaims asserted in Harris's Answer and Counterclaim against Kane.
The parties further stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
***
***
***
***
***
***
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.