Opinion
May 14, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).
The record reveals no reason to interfere with the IAS court's supervision of disclosure and control of its own calendar (Baker v. Wight, 158 A.D.2d 293; Novaro v. Jomar Real Estate Corp., 156 A.D.2d 213). There were no outstanding discovery notices at the time plaintiff filed its statement of readiness, and the IAS court properly refused to allow further disclosure that would reveal matter prepared solely for litigation or trade secrets immaterial to the issue of damages.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.