From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaminik v. Countrywide Home Loans

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 6, 2011
64 So. 3d 195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

affirming in part a summary final judgment of foreclosure where the plaintiff “tendered the original promissory note to the trial court, which contained a special indorsement in its favor”

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing

Opinion

No. 4D09-4861.

July 6, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-54576CACE(03).

Enrique Nieves and Thomas E. Ice of Ice Legal, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Thomasina F. Moore and Dennis W. Moore of Butler Hosch, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.


We affirm in part the summary final judgment of foreclosure. The record demonstrates that appellee tendered the original promissory note to the trial court, which contained a special indorsement in its favor. See Servedio v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 46 So.3d 1105, 1106-07 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Riggs v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 36 So.3d 932, 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Jacobs v. Becks, 355 So.2d 1241, 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). As to the defense of unclean hands, no fact in the record and nothing in the briefing supports that defense. See Tacher v. Helm Bank, 50 So.3d 1239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); S. Waste Sys., LLC v. J A Transfer, Inc., 879 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We reverse the award of $4,685.50 in attorney's fees because appellee's affidavit stated that $887 was a reasonable fee, creating an issue of fact as to the amount to be awarded. We also reverse the award of $14,120.08 in interest, which was greater than the $5,897.20 specified in the affidavit of indebtedness; the interest rate was variable, and the variation was a matter of proof.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

STEVENSON, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaminik v. Countrywide Home Loans

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 6, 2011
64 So. 3d 195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

affirming in part a summary final judgment of foreclosure where the plaintiff “tendered the original promissory note to the trial court, which contained a special indorsement in its favor”

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing

reversing fee award but otherwise affirming summary final judgment of foreclosure where the record demonstrated that the appellee “tendered the original promissory note to the trial court, which contained a special indorsement in its favor”

Summary of this case from McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'n

reversing fee award but otherwise affirming summary final judgment of foreclosure where the record demonstrated that the appellee "tendered the original promissory note to the trial court, which contained a special indorsement in its favor"

Summary of this case from McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Case details for

Kaminik v. Countrywide Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:Sasha KAMINIK and Paul Connolly, Appellants, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 6, 2011

Citations

64 So. 3d 195 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing

”); Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Azize, 965 So.2d 151, 153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The holder of a…

McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Ass'n

Later, however, Chase filed with the circuit court the original promissory note, which bore a special…