From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamil v. Richenthal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 27, 2011
88 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-27

Susan KAMIL, Plaintiff–Respondent,v.David RICHENTHAL, Defendant–Appellant.


Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from an order

of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered on or about June 22, 2010, and a judgment, same court and Justice, entered June 23, 2010,

And said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated September 16, 2011,

It is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SAXE, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, RICHTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kamil v. Richenthal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 27, 2011
88 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Kamil v. Richenthal

Case Details

Full title:Susan KAMIL, Plaintiff–Respondent,v.David RICHENTHAL, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
931 N.Y.S.2d 505
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7568