Opinion
Argued December 19, 1894
Decided January 15, 1895
Bernard J. Isecke for appellant.
A.H. Berrick for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Von Kamen v. Roes
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 15, 1895
39 N.E. 858 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Von Kamen v. Roes
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 15, 1895
39 N.E. 858 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Von Kamen v. Roes
Case Details
Full title:HERMAN J. VON KAMEN, Appellant, v . DIEDERICH ROES, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 15, 1895
Citations
39 N.E. 858 (N.Y. 1895)
144 N.Y. 685
Citing Cases
Estelle v. Dinsbeer
In this case no condition is violated, but the term expires of its own limitation upon the happening of the…