From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamedula v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 8, 2011
373 P.3d 931 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 58551 58552 58619 58620.

07-08-2011

Brian KAMEDULA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. Brian Kamedula, Appellant, v. The State of Nevada, Respondent. Brian Kamedula, Appellant, v. The State of Nevada, Respondent. Brian Kamedula, Appellant, v. The State of Nevada, Respondent.

Brian Kamedula Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Brian Kamedula

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are proper person appeals from decisions denying a motion for sentencing transcripts and a motion to strike, and purported decisions denying replies to various motions. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge. We elect to consolidate these appeals for disposition. NRAP 3(b)(2).

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for sentencing transcripts and a motion to strike, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). To the extent that appellant designated hearings in which replies were to be considered, no hearings occurred on the dates designated and the documents before this court do not indicate decisions on the proper person documents designated. Accordingly, we

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Kamedula v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 8, 2011
373 P.3d 931 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Kamedula v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brian KAMEDULA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. Brian…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 8, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 931 (Nev. 2011)