From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamedula v. Dixon

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 23, 2011
3:10-cv-00749-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00749-ECR-VPC.

March 23, 2011


ORDER


On February 3, 2011, this court dismissed plaintiff's complaint and granted him leave to file an amended complaint (docket #3). On February 22, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (docket #6). His appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on March 16, 2011 (docket #10). Accordingly, plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to file his amended complaint, if he chooses to file one, in conformance with this court's Order of February 3, 2011.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty days (30) from the date of this Order to file his amended complaint, if he chooses to file one, in conformance with this court's Screening Order of February 3, 2011 (docket #3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this entire action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (docket #8) is DENIED as moot.

DATED this 22nd day of March 2011.


Summaries of

Kamedula v. Dixon

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 23, 2011
3:10-cv-00749-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Kamedula v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KAMEDULA, #24627 Plaintiff, v. TODD DIXON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

Citations

3:10-cv-00749-ECR-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)