Opinion
No. 18-55759
03-19-2019
KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in official capacity; PATRICIA A. BIGELOW, in official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-04555-GW-RAO MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of Article III standing. Lopez v. Candaele, 630 F.3d 775, 784-85 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Kamal's action because Kamal failed to allege facts sufficient to show an injury in fact. See id. at 785 (elements of Article III standing).
Kamal's motion to augment the record and to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 9) is denied.
AFFIRMED.