Kamack v. Soto

Full title: RAMELLE KAMACK, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 20, 2013

CV 12-10737-JAK (OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2013)

Opinion

RAMELLE KAMACK, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 12-10737-JAK (OP) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 20, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.