From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KAM v. BLANK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 22, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

March 22, 1960

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Kings County MEYER TOBIAS, J.

Eugene R. Canudo for appellants.

Harold S. Winston for respondent.


The court erred in determining as a matter of law that the general release delivered to John I. Phlegar, Jr., discharged the defendant, a cotort-feasor. The general release effected a settlement of the action in New Jersey. Under the circumstances, the law of New Jersey should have been applied in a determination of the effect of the general release upon the liability of a cotort-feasor. The burden of proof is upon the defendant to sustain his contention that a general release under the law of New Jersey releases a cotort-feasor.

The judgment and order should be unanimously reversed, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event and motion for a new trial granted.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, BENJAMIN and DALY, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

KAM v. BLANK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 22, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

KAM v. BLANK

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA KAM, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, LEAH KAM, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1960

Citations

23 Misc. 2d 951 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
199 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

Garlock v. New York Tree Savers, Inc.

De Bono v. Bittner, 13 Misc.2d 333, 178 N.Y.S.2d 419 (S.Ct. 1958), aff'd 10 A.D.2d 556, 196 N.Y.S.2d 595 (1st…