From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalwasinski v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-9

In the Matter of Mitchell J. KALWASINSKI, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Mitchell J. Kalwasinski, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.


Mitchell J. Kalwasinski, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Joseph v. LaClair, 87 A.D.3d 780, 780–781, 927 N.Y.S.2d 806 [2011]; Matter of Kairis v. Fischer, 86 A.D.3d 868, 868, 927 N.Y.S.2d 611 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

MERCURE, Acting P.J., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kalwasinski v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 9, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Kalwasinski v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mitchell J. KALWASINSKI, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 1069 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 889
937 N.Y.S.2d 894

Citing Cases

Sykes v. Fischer

Although petitioner requests that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the tier III hearing,…

Skyes v. Fischer

Although petitioner requests that he be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the tier III hearing,…