From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalra v. Upadhyaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1992
181 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 26, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eve M. Preminger, J.).


There is no showing that the IAS court abused its broad discretion to supervise disclosure and issue protective orders (Nitz v Prudential-Bache Sec., 102 A.D.2d 914). Nor was the denial of summary judgment improper where, as here, triable issues of fact exist as to the reasonableness of the medical treatment administered. Further there appear to be pertinent facts within plaintiff's knowledge and control which may be revealed through pretrial disclosure.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Kalra v. Upadhyaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1992
181 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Kalra v. Upadhyaya

Case Details

Full title:RAMESH KALRA, Appellant, v. PADMANABH UPADHYAYA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)