From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalra v. New York Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 10, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment since the plaintiff failed to present proof of any material questions of fact which would preclude such relief ( see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). Moreover, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate how further discovery might reveal the existence of material facts, currently within the exclusive knowledge and control of the defendants, which would warrant the denial of summary judgment ( see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Delaney v Good Samaritan Hosp., 204 A.D.2d 678).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kalra v. New York Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kalra v. New York Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:JAG MOHAN KALRA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Guzman v. Initial Contract Services, Inc

In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to identify the substance which allegedly caused the plaintiff Mildred…

Brady v. Correctional Transportation, Inc.

Therefore, the appellant's motion should have been granted. There was no showing that discovery might reveal…