From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalpin v. Taxation Div. Director

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jan 18, 1984
6 N.J. Tax 258 (Tax 1984)

Opinion

Submitted January 10, 1984.

Decided January 18, 1984.

Appeal from the Tax Court.

Before Judges BOTTER and PRESSLER.

Richard A. Koerner, for appellant.

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondent ( James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harley A. Williams, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).


Case below: 5 N.J. Tax 172.

The issue on this appeal is whether materials purchased by appellant which are used in his foundry operation, namely, sands, binders and washes, were exempt from taxation under the sales tax law by reason of the exemption provided in N.J.S.A. 54:32B-8.20. These materials do not become a component part of the finished product. Moreover, Tax Court Judge Andrew found from the evidence that the materials were not used "to induce or cause a refining or chemical process." As a result, Judge Andrew concluded that the exemption did not apply, and we agree.

The judgment below is supported by substantial credible evidence and must be affirmed. R. 2.11-3(e)(1)(A) and (E); Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474 , 483-484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kalpin v. Taxation Div. Director

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jan 18, 1984
6 N.J. Tax 258 (Tax 1984)
Case details for

Kalpin v. Taxation Div. Director

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. KALPIN, T/A GENERAL FOUNDRY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 18, 1984

Citations

6 N.J. Tax 258 (Tax 1984)

Citing Cases

Phelps Dodge Indus. v. Taxation Div. Director

Reported court decisions which deal with the issue of whether specific materials cause or induce a refining…