From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kallman v. Wolf Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1966
25 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

February 3, 1966


Order vacating the judgment herein entered July 9, 1964 unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. The assessment of punitive damages is an incident of damages which requires proof of a cause of action; punitive damage does not constitute a separate cause of action. ( Gill v. Montgomery Ward Co., 284 App. Div. 36, 41.) The vacatur of the California judgment removed the basis for the judgment herein because the complaint is grounded solely on the California judgment.

Concur — McNally, J.P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.


Summaries of

Kallman v. Wolf Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1966
25 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Kallman v. Wolf Corporation

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN KALLMAN, Appellant, v. WOLF CORPORATION et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Shandell v. Katz

These counterclaims are dismissed. In addition, the third counterclaim, which seeks punitive damages, should…

Schneider v. Jarmain

Thus, the harmful conduct must be "intentional, malicious, outrageous, or otherwise aggravated beyond mere…