From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalk v. Funk

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 26, 2023
3:22-cv-00243 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 26, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00243

07-26-2023

ROBERT HARRISON KALK, Plaintiff, v. GLENN FUNK, Defendant.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 35) recommending the Court grant Defendant Glenn Funk's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27). Kalk, proceeding pro se, failed to file a timely objection.

A party's failure to “timely object to a report and recommendation releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Lawhorn v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00201, 2021 WL 1063075, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2021); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”).

Regardless, the Court thoroughly reviewed the R&R and agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Thus, the R&R (Doc. No. 35) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Defendant Funk's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This is a final order. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kalk v. Funk

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 26, 2023
3:22-cv-00243 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Kalk v. Funk

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HARRISON KALK, Plaintiff, v. GLENN FUNK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jul 26, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00243 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 26, 2023)