Summary
denying Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the complaint without leave to amend
Summary of this case from Kalincheva v. NeubarthOpinion
Case No. 3:13-cv-104
03-25-2014
Magdalina Kalincheva MD, Plaintiff, v. Jesse Neubarth, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING CASE
The Court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, recommending that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and this action be dismissed (Doc. #5). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation (Docs. #6, 7), and a series of new motions (Docs. #9, 11).
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections, the Report and Recommendation, and the entire file, and finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendations are appropriate. Upon de novo review, the Court can find no cognizable claim alleged in this case in which this Court has jurisdiction to decide. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #1) is DENIED. In addition, Plaintiff's motion for emergency relief (Doc. #9) and motion to add Dr. Daniel R. Cotton (Doc. #11) are also DENIED as moot in light of this Court's determination that jurisdiction is lacking. This case is hereby DISMISSED.
The Court certifies that any appeal would be frivolous, could not be taken in good faith, and may not be taken in forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
__________
Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge
United States District Court