From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalfus v. Kalfus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1997
243 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


The matter must be remitted for a new decision since it appears from plaintiff's affidavit in support of her motion to confirm the Special Referee's report that minutes of the hearing were taken, submission of the transcript thereof was not waived and the court rendered its decision without having before it "the testimony in some form or agreement by the parties as to its substance sufficient to permit the court to pass upon a challenge made to the sufficiency of the evidence" ( Matter of Shulman v Elco Constr. Corp., 12 A.D.2d 460, quoting Aron v. Aron, 280 N.Y. 328, 330).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Tom and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Kalfus v. Kalfus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1997
243 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Kalfus v. Kalfus

Case Details

Full title:PENNY KALFUS, Respondent, v. ROBERT KALFUS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 526

Citing Cases

MMAL Corp. v. Edrich

pretation of the referee would run contrary to the parties' intentions, inasmuch as the rider operates to…

MMAL Corp. v. Edrich

retation of the referee would run contrary to the parties' intentions, inasmuch as the rider operates to…