From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalfani v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 13, 2019
278 So. 3d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2D19-2915

08-13-2019

Amenhotep KALFANI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance in the trial court, such as by filing a motion to hear and rule, before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). The court also notes that, although the petitioner identifies the underlying rule 3.800(a) motion as having been filed on January 10 or 15, 2019, the circuit court's online docket does not reflect such a filing on or near those dates. A motion to correct illegal sentence was filed in the circuit court on October 29, 2018.

MORRIS, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Kalfani v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 13, 2019
278 So. 3d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Kalfani v. State

Case Details

Full title:Amenhotep KALFANI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 13, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)