From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalani v. Castle Village LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
CIV. S-12-2330 LKK/CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion


ROBERT KALANI, Plaintiff, v. CASTLE VILLAGE LLC, FUJINAKA PROPERTIES, L.P., Defendants. No. CIV. S-12-2330 LKK/CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. December 11, 2013

          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application (ECF No. 22) for certain discovery, and also to modify the court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order of November 15, 2012 (ECF No. 17). The application does not show good cause for the court to alter the Scheduling Order. If the parties wish to make informal arrangements regarding discovery deadlines they are free to do so. However, any such consensual modifications to the Scheduling Order will not be enforced by the Court.

         Accordingly, the portion of the application seeking a modification to the Scheduling Order, is DENIED. The remainder of the application (ECF No. 22), is referred back to Magistrate Judge Delaney.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kalani v. Castle Village LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
CIV. S-12-2330 LKK/CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Kalani v. Castle Village LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KALANI, Plaintiff, v. CASTLE VILLAGE LLC, FUJINAKA PROPERTIES…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

CIV. S-12-2330 LKK/CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)