From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalani v. Castle Park, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 19, 2013
2:12-cv-2330 LKK CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2013)

Opinion


ROBERT KALANI, Plaintiff, v. CASTLE PARK, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2330 LKK CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. December 19, 2013

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Pending before the court are plaintiff's ex parte applications regarding discovery disputes. A telephonic conference was held before the undersigned regarding plaintiff's ex parte application to compel attendance at depositions. In light of the recent association of defense counsel, plaintiff's ex parte applications will be denied at this time. It is the court's expectation that the parties will meaningfully meet and confer regarding the setting of depositions and site inspections. Should further discovery disputes arise in this action which require court intervention, the parties are directed to submit a joint letter brief, not exceeding four pages. Upon review of the letter brief, the matter will be set for hearing should the court deem it necessary.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's ex parte applications (ECF Nos. 22, 24) are denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Kalani v. Castle Park, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 19, 2013
2:12-cv-2330 LKK CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Kalani v. Castle Park, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KALANI, Plaintiff, v. CASTLE PARK, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 19, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-2330 LKK CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2013)