From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaiser v. Herrington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 16, 2023
3:22-cv-05944-TL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 16, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05944-TL-JRC

03-16-2023

MICHAEL COLE KAISER, Plaintiff, v. RYAN HERRINGTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL

J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel which seeks a court order directing defendants to restore the previous dosages of plaintiff's prescribed medications. Dkt. 25. Plaintiff claims that when he was transferred to SCCC, the DOC medical department lowered or discontinued his necessary medications without explanation. Id. Because granting plaintiff's motion would result in a requirement that defendants change plaintiff's current prescribed medications, the Court's determination as to plaintiff's motion would benefit from a response from defendants.

Therefore, it is ORDERED:

(1) Defendants are directed to respond to plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. 25) by April 7, 2023. Plaintiff may file a reply to their response on or before April 14, 2023.
(2) The Clerk is directed to re-note the motion to compel (Dkt. 25) for consideration on April 14, 2023.


Summaries of

Kaiser v. Herrington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 16, 2023
3:22-cv-05944-TL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Kaiser v. Herrington

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL COLE KAISER, Plaintiff, v. RYAN HERRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 16, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-05944-TL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 16, 2023)