Opinion
No. 93-2458.
April 12, 1994.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Michael H. Salmon, J.
Annis, Mitchell, Cockey, Edwards Roehn and Robert M. Daisley, Wolfgang M. Florin and Mercedes G. Hale, Tampa, for appellant.
Holland Knight and R. Thomas Farrar, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
The summary judgment entered below is reversed because there are genuine issues as to (a) whether the phrase in dispute has the meaning contended for by the appellant and (b) whether, if so, it formed a part of the binding agreement between the parties.