From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kainz v. Bernstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 14, 2019
19 CIVIL 2499 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2019)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 2499 (LLS)

11-14-2019

ROMAN KAINZ, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE T. BERNSTEIN, RICHARD K. ABBE, ANDREW R. HEYER, DONALD E. STOUT, SALVATORE GIARDINA, JOHN ENGELMAN, WILLIAM PHOENIX, ANDREW D. PERLMAN, and XPRESSPA GROUP, INC. f/k/a Form Holdings Corp., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum & Order dated November 13, 2019, Defendants' motion for oral argument is denied. Plaintiff's cross-motion for a partial stay is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and judgment is entered dismissing the complaint. Dated: New York, New York

November 14, 2019

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Kainz v. Bernstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 14, 2019
19 CIVIL 2499 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Kainz v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:ROMAN KAINZ, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE T. BERNSTEIN, RICHARD K. ABBE, ANDREW R…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 14, 2019

Citations

19 CIVIL 2499 (LLS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2019)