From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaintz v. The Goodman Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 23, 2021
8:20-cv-2115-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

8:20-cv-2115-VMC-AAS

08-23-2021

ROB KAINTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. THE GOODMAN GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. # 45). The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45), filed on August 9, 2021, recommends that Plaintiff Rob Kaintz's unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement (Doc. # 36) be granted. The parties have filed a joint notice indicating that neither of them objects to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. # 47).

The Court accepts and adopts in part the Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45), and grants Kaintz's unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement (Doc. # 36). The Report and Recommendation is adopted in all respects except insofar as it provides that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. (Doc. # 45 at 5).

Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by the magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F.Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

Upon due consideration of the record, the Court adopts in substantive part the Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with Judge Sansone's detailed and well-reasoned findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Report and Recommendation thoughtfully addresses the issues presented, and neither party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED except insofar as it provides that the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the class action settlement agreement. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.

(2) Plaintiff Rob Kaintz's unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement (Doc. # 36) is GRANTED.

(3) The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kaintz v. The Goodman Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 23, 2021
8:20-cv-2115-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Kaintz v. The Goodman Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ROB KAINTZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

8:20-cv-2115-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2021)