Kailyn S. v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Violet W. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs.

    Supreme Court S-17952 (Alaska Aug. 18, 2021)

    AS 47.10.088(j); see also CINA Rule 18(e).Kailyn S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 420 P.3d 1232, 1233 (Alaska 2018).Rowan B. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 361 P.3d 910, 912-13 (Alaska 2015) (quoting A.A. v. State, Dep't of Family & Youth Servs., 982 P.2d 256, 259 (Alaska 1999)).

  2. Pamiuqtuuq C. v. Alaska Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs.

    Supreme Court No. S-17677 (Alaska Nov. 25, 2020)   Cited 1 times
    Concluding court abused its discretion where therapist acting as hybrid witness testified "beyond the scope of the services" provided "to render opinions about . . . children when they did not provide the children services"

    We review the denial of a continuance request for abuse of discretion, "considering the particular circumstances to determine whether a party was 'deprived of a substantial right or seriously prejudiced' by the superior court's ruling." Kailyn S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 420 P.3d 1232, 1233 (Alaska 2018) (quoting Clementine F. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 375 P.3d 39, 43 (Alaska 2016)). We also apply the abuse of discretion standard to a superior court's decision to admit expert testimony. Marron v. Stromstad, 123 P.3d 992, 998 (Alaska 2005).