From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahre-Richardes v. Village of Baldwinsville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

July 12, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: The trial court erred in holding that actual receipt of a notice to redeem by a real property owner is required for compliance with RPTL 1464 (1). Because defendant Robroy's certified mailing of the notice to redeem to plaintiffs complied with RPTL 1464 (1) and is a method "reasonably calculated" to apprise the property owners in this tax foreclosure proceeding of their right to redeem their property, the requirements of due process have been met (see, Harville v County of Erie, 148 A.D.2d 954).


Summaries of

Kahre-Richardes v. Village of Baldwinsville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1989
152 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Kahre-Richardes v. Village of Baldwinsville

Case Details

Full title:KAHRE-RICHARDES FAMILY FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Respondents, v. VILLAGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

152 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)