From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahn v. Wertheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

January, 1932.


Order denying plaintiff's motion to require defendant to appear for examination to enable plaintiff to frame his complaint reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs; examination to proceed on five days' notice. The facts asserted by the plaintiff, standing undenied, require that he be permitted to examine the defendant so as to enable him to frame a complaint upon the theory, applicable to the facts, which he deems desirable. ( Teall v. Roeser, 206 App. Div. 371; Heye v. American Chemical Eduction Co., 185 id. 13.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kahn v. Wertheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Kahn v. Wertheim

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KAHN, Appellant, v. SANDERS A. WERTHEIM, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)