From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahn v. Stern

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Mar 15, 2018
183 A.3d 715 (Del. 2018)

Summary

requiring plaintiff to "plead[] facts that support a rational inference of bad faith" rather than requiring plaintiff to "plead facts that rule out any possibility other than bad faith" (citing Brinckerhoff v. Enbridge Energy Co., Inc., 159 A.3d 242, 258-60 (Del. 2017), rev'd (Mar. 28, 2017))

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Berry

Opinion

No. 393, 2017

03-15-2018

Alan KAHN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Michael D. STERN, Edward A. Stern, Joseph P. Daly, John W. Poling, and Jeffrey P. Bacher, Defendants Below, Appellees.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kahn v. Stern

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Mar 15, 2018
183 A.3d 715 (Del. 2018)

requiring plaintiff to "plead[] facts that support a rational inference of bad faith" rather than requiring plaintiff to "plead facts that rule out any possibility other than bad faith" (citing Brinckerhoff v. Enbridge Energy Co., Inc., 159 A.3d 242, 258-60 (Del. 2017), rev'd (Mar. 28, 2017))

Summary of this case from Morrison v. Berry
Case details for

Kahn v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:Alan KAHN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Michael D. STERN, Edward A…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Mar 15, 2018

Citations

183 A.3d 715 (Del. 2018)

Citing Cases

Morrison v. Berry

Ch. 2014))). Kahn v. Stern, 183 A.3d 715, at *1 n.3 (Del. 2018) (TABLE) ("The presence of an exculpatory…

Teamsters Local 237 Additional Sec. Benefit Fund v. Caruso

Thus, the Delaware Supreme Court has recognized that a plaintiff can state a claim under Revlon by pleading…