From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 11, 1984
447 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1855.

April 11, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Paul M. Marko III, J.

David L. Kahn, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James P. McLane, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The trial court held appellant, counsel in a civil case, in direct criminal contempt for certain conduct which occurred during trial. The court failed to comply fully with Rule 3.830, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which requires the court to inform the alleged contemnor of the accusation against him, inquire whether he can show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt, and give him an opportunity to present evidence of mitigating circumstances. Compliance with these procedural safeguards is mandatory. Holden v. State, 380 So.2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to conduct a hearing in compliance with Rule 3.830.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kahn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 11, 1984
447 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Kahn v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. KAHN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 11, 1984

Citations

447 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

See Clark. On remand, the trial judge must conduct a new hearing on the first charge in accordance with the…

Walker v. State

She was not informed of the charge, nor was she given an opportunity to show cause or to present evidence of…