From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahn v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02501-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02502-BNB

09-29-2011

ROY ALBERT KAHN, Applicant, v. WARDEN C. DANIELS, USP Florence, Respondent.


ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed on September 23, 2011, in this case and pursuant to Redmon v. Wiley, 550 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has determined that a limited Preliminary Response is appropriate. Respondent is directed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts to file a Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies. If Respondent does not intend to raise this affirmative defense, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response. Respondent may not file a dispositive motion as a Preliminary Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to this Order.

In support of the Preliminary Response, Respondent should attach as exhibits copies of any administrative grievances Applicant has filed raising the issues asserted in the Application, as well as any responses to those grievances. Applicant may reply to the Preliminary Response and provide any information that might be relevant to his efforts to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response.

DATED September 29, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02502-BNB

Roy Albert Kahn

Reg. No. 69869-004

USP Florence - High

PO Box 7000

Florence, CO 81226

C Daniels, Warden - CERTIFIED

USP Florence - High

PO Box 7500

Florence, CO 81226

United States Attorney General - CERTIFIED

Room 5111, Main Justice Bldg.

10th and Constitution, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530

United States Attorney

District of Colorado

DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY

I hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named individuals, and the following forms to C Daniels, to The United States Attorney General, and to the United States Attorney's Office: APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 9/23/11 on September 29, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:__________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Kahn v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02501-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Kahn v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:ROY ALBERT KAHN, Applicant, v. WARDEN C. DANIELS, USP Florence, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02501-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 29, 2011)