From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 23, 2005
914 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D05-3270.

November 23, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; John E. Fennelly, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 00-1675CFA, 00-1647CFA, 00-1635CFA, 00-1625CFA 00-1237CFA.

Michael J. Kahane, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The circuit court's order is reversed. Our denial of Appellant's prior mandamus proceeding, brought in connection with his incarceration in a Martin County felony case, was without prejudice to file Rule 3.800(a) motion in the circuit court. When he filed such a motion, the circuit court struck the pleading, because in a case in St. Lucie County, the appellant had been prohibited from filing further pro se filings. It does not appear that such an order has been entered in the circuit court in and for Martin County in Appellant's case. Regardless, we direct that if Appellant files a legally sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion, the circuit court shall consider the motion on the merits. This opinion does not authorize Appellant to raise any claim other than his claim for jail credit as to his Martin County conviction.

Reversed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kahane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 23, 2005
914 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Kahane v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. KAHANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 23, 2005

Citations

914 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)