Opinion
November 9, 1954.
Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.;
Judgment affirmed. No opinion.
The testimony of plaintiff's eyewitness to the accident is against the weight of credible evidence as to traffic conditions at the time and his testimony as to what he saw is open to serious question. Accepting that evidence, however, it is difficult, if not impossible, to see how the accident could have happened without plaintiff's decedent being contributorily negligent. The verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence.