From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kahala v. Aldrich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Dec 7, 1933
169 A. 291 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted October 13, 1933 —

Decided December 7, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 680.

For the appellant, Thompson Hanstein.

For the respondent, Albert N. Shahadi.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Kahala v. Aldrich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Dec 7, 1933
169 A. 291 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Kahala v. Aldrich

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP KAHALA, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM F. ALDRICH, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Dec 7, 1933

Citations

169 A. 291 (N.J. 1933)
169 A. 291