From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kadiyala v. Pupke

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 30, 2024
No. 17-80732-CIV-KAM (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2024)

Opinion

17-80732-CIV-KAM

08-30-2024

RAVI KADIYALA, individually, and as the Assignee of CREDIT UNION MORTGAGE UTILITY BANC, INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. MARK JOHN PUPKE, MARIE MOLLY PUPKE, Defendants. MARK JOHN PUPKE and MARIE MOLLY PUPKE, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. RAVI KADIYALA, individually, and as the Assignee of CREDIT UNION MORTGAGE UTILITY BANC, INC. an Illinois corporation, Counterclaim Defendant.


ORDER

KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Renewed Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses and Costs (DE 316).

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable William Matthewman, United States Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Florida. A Report and Recommendation, dated August 15, 2024, has been filed, recommending that the district court award Plaintiff attorneys' fees in the amount of $484,623.95 and non-taxable costs in the amount of $13,539.40, for a total award of $498,163.35 against Defendant Mark Pupke.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the entire file, the record herein and the objections filed by Defendant Mark Pupke. The Court overrules Mr. Pupke's objections. The objections attack the underlying judgment which has been affirmed on appeal. See Kadiyala v. Pupke, No. 22-10211, 2024 WL 33910 (11th Cir. Jan. 3, 2024). As such, it is now the law of the case and the Court is not free to alter or amend the judgment, especially on a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Alphamed, Inc. v. B. Braun Medical, Inc., 367 F.3d 1280, 1285 (11th Cir. 2004) (“Under the law of the case doctrine, both district courts and appellate courts are generally bound by a prior appellate decision in the same case.”); Litman v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 825 F.2d 1506, 1511 (11th Cir.1987) (“The law of the case doctrine, self-imposed by the courts, operates to create efficiency, finality and obedience within the judicial system.”).

The Court construes Defendant Mark Pupke's motion for reconsideration (DE 346) as objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1) The Report is AFFIRMED.

2) Plaintiff's Renewed Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Expenses and Costs (DE 316) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART in the total amount of $498,163.35.

3) The Court will separately issue Judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kadiyala v. Pupke

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Aug 30, 2024
No. 17-80732-CIV-KAM (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Kadiyala v. Pupke

Case Details

Full title:RAVI KADIYALA, individually, and as the Assignee of CREDIT UNION MORTGAGE…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Aug 30, 2024

Citations

No. 17-80732-CIV-KAM (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2024)