From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaderavek v. Fuetterer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

May, 1931.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff did not seasonably make a motion to amend the verdict and now his only remedy is to move to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. ( MacDonald v. Kusch, 188 App. Div. 491.) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaderavek v. Fuetterer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Kaderavek v. Fuetterer

Case Details

Full title:OTTO KADERAVEK, Appellant, v. LOUIS FUETTERER and HENRY HUERLANDER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)