From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaddoura v. Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC)

09-30-2011

HASAM KADDOURA, Petitioner, v. F.X. CHAVEZ, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's September 23, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ____


Summaries of

Kaddoura v. Chavez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Kaddoura v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:HASAM KADDOURA, Petitioner, v. F.X. CHAVEZ, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)