From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaddoura v. Chavez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 4, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC).

October 4, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's September 23, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: September 30, 2011.


Summaries of

Kaddoura v. Chavez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 4, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Kaddoura v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:HASAM KADDOURA, Petitioner, v. F.X. CHAVEZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1208 KJM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)