From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kadaa v. Kadaa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2011
80 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-09274.

January 25, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated July 7, 2009, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Edward Vilinsky, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Jeffrey Stern of counsel), for appellant.

Connors Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Michael J. Caulfield and David S. Heller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Lott, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint as, under the circumstances, the defendant did not owe any duty of care to the plaintiff ( see Pulka v Edelman, 40 NY2d 781; Cruz v New York City Tr. Auth., 136 AD2d 196). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Kadaa v. Kadaa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2011
80 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Kadaa v. Kadaa

Case Details

Full title:ROSE KADAA, by Her Guardian ad Litem, MARY KADAA, Appellant, v. ALBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

Citations

80 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 488
915 N.Y.S.2d 862