From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kabyesiza v. GEO Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03105-WJM-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-03105-WJM-KLM

09-16-2011

FIDEL M. KABYESIZA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE GEO GROUP, a Florida corporation, TERESA HUNT, in her official and individual capacity, TERRY MAKETA, in his official and individual capacity, and JOHN DOES 1-2, in their official and individual capacities, Defendant.


Judge William J. Martínez


ORDER AFFIRMING AUGUST 10, 2011 RECOMMENDATION AND

DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court on the August 10, 2011 Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 58.) The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 26 at 2 n.1.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation were filed by either party. "In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate . . . [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings").

The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's thorough and comprehensive analyses and recommendations are correct and that "there is no clear error on the face of the record." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 58), filed August 10, 2011, is ACCEPTED. For the reasons cited therein, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendants.

BY THE COURT:

William J. Martínez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kabyesiza v. GEO Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03105-WJM-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Kabyesiza v. GEO Grp.

Case Details

Full title:FIDEL M. KABYESIZA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE GEO GROUP, a Florida…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-03105-WJM-KLM (D. Colo. Sep. 16, 2011)