From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kabede v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-2140 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-2140 KJM CKD P

05-28-2019

WOODYARD KABEDE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 11, 2019, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 28, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
kabe2140.fta


Summaries of

Kabede v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 28, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-2140 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Kabede v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:WOODYARD KABEDE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-2140 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)