K-Tech Telecomms., Inc. v. Blonder Tongue Labs., Inc.

Full title: K-TECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLONDER TONGUE…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 2014

562 F. App'x 972 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2013-1645

04-16-2014

K-TECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES, INC., R.L. DRAKE HOLDINGS, LLC, R.L. DRAKE, LLC, AND RLD69. LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

PATRICK F. BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, P.C., of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. JOHN C. MCNETT, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was BLAKE R. HARTZ. Of counsel on the brief was FRANK C. CORSO, Corso Law LLC, of Rehoboth, Massachusetts.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 12-CV-5316, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK F. BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, P.C., of Glendale, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

JOHN C. MCNETT, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was BLAKE R. HARTZ. Of counsel on the brief was FRANK C. CORSO, Corso Law LLC, of Rehoboth, Massachusetts. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court