Since it had a legitimate purpose, this conduct cannot support a full order of protection. See R.J.D. v. Gauert, 622 S.W.3d 703, 710 (Mo. App. W.D. 2021) (holding that landowner’s act of following trespassers around property had a legitimate purpose and thus could not support a full order of protection); see also Clark v. Wuebbeling, 217 S.W.3d 352, 355 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007) (finding that communication between parents regarding care of children had a legitimate purpose); c.f. J.W.M. v. D.L.O., 643 S.W.3d 903, 908 (Mo. App. E.D. 2022) (holding that slashing tires, threatening to involve violent father, and stating that the person was "worth more dead than alive" was conduct that "was threatening and violent and readily crossed the threshold between normal social interactions and stalking" and thus no longer had a legitimate purpose). II. Domestic Violence - Stalking