From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 26, 1995
667 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-382.

July 26, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County; Charles D. McClure, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


No recording of the trial in this case is available because of a malfunction in the recording equipment. The trial court has entered an order finding that the parties are unable to agree on the events at trial and certifies that the record cannot be reconstructed. Appellant moves to vacate his conviction. The state concedes that remand for a new trial is the appropriate remedy.

The granting of a new trial is the proper remedy when an adequate record cannot be prepared. Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1977). This principle has been deemed applicable to juvenile cases. M.R.G. v. State, 576 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial.

ERVIN, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 26, 1995
667 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

J.W. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.W., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 26, 1995

Citations

667 So. 2d 207 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

J.R.V. v. State

Because the record of the adjudicatory hearing cannot be transcribed and the parties cannot reconstruct the…

D.W. v. State

This principle has been deemed applicable to juvenile cases. J.W. v. State, 667 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA…