Juvenile Officer v. L.M. (In re Interest of K.M-H.)

Full title: In the INTEREST OF K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H., Respondents, Juvenile…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 31, 2022

645 S.W.3d 119 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84706

05-31-2022

In the INTEREST OF K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H., Respondents, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Department of Social Services, Children's Division, Respondent, v. L.M., Appellant.

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Respondent Juvenile Officer. Tyler C. Smith, Co-Counsel for Juvenile Officer. Bree A. Sturner, Co-Counsel for Juvenile Office. Catherine M. Wiehl, for Respondents K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H. Claire M. Terrebonne, Kansas City, Co-Counsel for Respondents K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H. Allison G. Kort, Kansas City, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.

Tyler C. Smith, Co-Counsel for Juvenile Officer.

Bree A. Sturner, Co-Counsel for Juvenile Office.

Catherine M. Wiehl, for Respondents K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H.

Claire M. Terrebonne, Kansas City, Co-Counsel for Respondents K.M-H., L.A.M-H., K.G.M-H.

Allison G. Kort, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM: L.M. appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County terminating her parental rights to her minor children. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).