From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jutras v. Graham

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 19, 2009
Case No. 09-cv-151-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 19, 2009)

Summary

holding that prisoner's allegations regarding tampering with legal mail failed to state a claim because, in part, "[he] has not indicated that he was harmed in any way by the actions alleged"

Summary of this case from Gillespie v. Wall

Opinion

Case No. 09-cv-151-PB.

June 19, 2009


ORDER


After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated June 8, 2009.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jutras v. Graham

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jun 19, 2009
Case No. 09-cv-151-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 19, 2009)

holding that prisoner's allegations regarding tampering with legal mail failed to state a claim because, in part, "[he] has not indicated that he was harmed in any way by the actions alleged"

Summary of this case from Gillespie v. Wall
Case details for

Jutras v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:David E. Jutras v. Dorothy Graham

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jun 19, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-cv-151-PB (D.N.H. Jun. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Gillespie v. Wall

Moreover, to the extent Plaintiff contends that the inspection of his legal mail interfered with his access…