From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell ( see, Morgan v. Genrich, 239 A.D.2d 919; Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Servs. [appeal No. 1], 238 A.D.2d 907; Keeton v. Cardinal O'Hara High School, 233 A.D.2d 839). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY JUSZCZAK et al., Respondents, v. NOCO MOTOR FUELS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1093 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 88