Opinion
December 23, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.).
This action seeking damages for employment discrimination was properly dismissed for failure to serve a notice of claim in view of Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law § 618 (1), which requires that a notice of claim be served on defendant in every action against it "for damages". Moreover, were we to reach plaintiff's claim, raised for the first time on this appeal, that the action seeks to vindicate a public interest, we would find otherwise (see, Mills v County of Monroe, 59 N.Y.2d 307, cert denied 464 U.S. 1018).
Concur — Wallach, J.P., Kupferman, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.