From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Justice Comm. v. Stanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 28, 2009
16 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D09-2360.

August 28, 2009.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Christian D. Lake, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.


The Justice Administrative Commission (JAC) petitions this court for a writ of certiorari, challenging a circuit court order compelling the JAC to process bills for payment of attorneys' fees on behalf of counsel who were appointed to represent the grandparents of a juvenile in a dependency proceeding. As indicated in Justice Administrative Commission v. Peterson, 989 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), and reiterated in Justice Administrative Commission v. Grover, 12 So.3d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), the grandparents do not have a constitutional or statutory right to such counsel and there is no authority to compel the JAC to effect payment of these fees. The circuit court thus departed from the essential requirements of law as to this matter. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore granted, and the challenged order is quashed.

KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Justice Comm. v. Stanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 28, 2009
16 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Justice Comm. v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:The JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION, A State Agency, Petitioner, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 28, 2009

Citations

16 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)