From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juskow v. Tow. Ulanow Swintego Jana Chrziciela

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

November 13, 1957

Appeal from the Cayuga Trial Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to any party, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: We believe that defendant's motion for a new trial should have been granted. The record is silent on any circumstances, either before or on the night in question, which put the defendant society on notice that guards or attendants should have been provided for the protection of occupants of the premises. Furthermore, the charge of the court may have led the jury erroneously to believe that there is absolute liability on the part of a membership corporation for all of the acts of its members. Though no exception was taken to the charge the interests of justice require a new trial, especially since we feel that the verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence. ( Zeffiro v. Porfido, 265 App. Div. 185, 186.) All concur.


Summaries of

Juskow v. Tow. Ulanow Swintego Jana Chrziciela

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1957
4 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Juskow v. Tow. Ulanow Swintego Jana Chrziciela

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JUSKOW, Respondent, v. TOW. ULANOW SWINTEGO JANA CHRZICIELA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Adelphi Hospital

Again, no exception was taken. The jurors, after deliberating for more than six hours, finally found for the…